
With neither a United Nations mandate nor the expected
British military support, the Obama administration faces the prospect of
undertaking military action against Syria with even less international and
domestic support than George W. Bush had for the Iraq war, which Obama voted
against.
Once in the White House, he quickly turned the
military's focus from Iraq to Afghanistan, which his aides had touted as the
"good war" in the fight against Islamic militants.
In 2010, he surged 33,000 additional troops to
Afghanistan, but gave his generals fewer troops and less time than they wanted.
The last of the surge troops returned home a year ago, and Obama plans to have
U.S. combat forces out by late 2014.
Obama sharply expanded the Bush administration's
program of drone strikes, and the presidential "kill list" proved
effective in taking out al Qaeda militants in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen
without putting U.S. forces in harm's way.
In May, against a background of civilian casualties,
growing anti-American sentiment and escalating criticism of the drone strikes
at home, Obama narrowed the targeted-killing campaign, saying it was time to
step back from a "boundless global war on terror." But the strikes
continued.
Obama also deployed
the military in NATO's bombing campaign against Libya's Muammar Gaddafi in
2011, citing the need to avert a mass slaughter resulting from government
assaults on rebel-held territory. His approach, predicated on Americans'
war-weariness, was described by one White House adviser as "leading from
behind," with U.S. forces supporting a British- and French-led air
assault. But the mission succeeded
source reuters.com
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario